(If you know anyone in the 4th Berkshire State Rep. District, let them know they’ve got a candidate who will lead the charge for single-payer healthcare and vibrant, green, forward-looking politics and public policy. – promoted by eli_beckerman)
My election to State Legislature in November of this year as a Green-Rainbow candidate will greatly advance the prospects for single payer health care in Massachusetts and in the United States.
(Update: July 7, a non-binding policy question on single payer health care will be on the Nov 2 ballot in the 4th Berkshire District. Read more…)
There are many groups advocating for single payer, but they often focus their efforts on lobbying incumbents to co-sponsor a bill, or they focus on educating a few candidates seeking the few open seats that arise. They are not making progress. We are further than ever away from the kind of health care security that citizens in most other advanced democracies enjoy.
My election will be a more powerful boost to the cause than would be the garnering of even twenty more co-sponsors to the bill. History has shown that co-sponsorhip is not enough; leaders must be vocal and strong because the opponents are vocal and strong. Most of the so-called “supporters” of single payer health care are silent on the issue, except for when they’re asking for votes.
Our nation’s debate over the last several decades, the success of Medicare, and the experience of other nations in implementing a single payer health care system, has convinced me that such a system – a comprehensive Medicare for all – is the right policy for Massachusetts and for the United States. Single payer costs less and delivers more. I have lived in countries that offer it and have seen the benefits first-hand: universal access to care, no cost barriers to getting care, no medical-related personal debt burdens or bankruptcies, and longer life expectancy.
The Green Party of the United States and the Green-Rainbow Party in Massachusetts are unequivocally for it. I will be a fervent ally and advancer of this important issue.
Single payer health care features prominently in my campaign, and its advance will be prominent when I am in office. It is a major part of the public infrastructure supporting private enterprise that I have written about. I will not only co-sponsor appropriate single payer legislation; I will be a vocal and ardent supporter in the public debate, and I will loudly de-bunk the many myths that are spread by those who profit from the status quo. Just you all wait to see what my town hall meetings will look like.
Have Bay State advocates for single payer health care taken note of the capitulation of Dennis Kucinich in last month’s health care vote in Washington? No one on the Congressional stage was a more passionate spokesman for single payer health care than Kucinich; however, his party leadership forced him to back down. As a green, I do not have that problem with my party leadership; we are united in our support for single payer health care – from local levels, through state levels, and to the national level.
I doubt that there are many so-called supporters of single payer health care in the State Legislature on Beacon Hill who have more spine than Dennis Kucinich did. Clearly, the strategy needs a change in course. Kucinich’s capitulation was a sad moment. I met the Congressman personally on several occasions, I set up a campaign office for him in Western Massachusetts during the presidential primary season in 2008, and campaigned on the streets of New Hampshire for him. I found no sincerity in the statement that he issued to explain his reversal. I hope he decides to join the Green Party of Ohio, where he will find a better political home.
I welcome the support of advocates for single payer health care in Massachusetts. I realize that most groups cannot make endorsements, but I look forward to being part of the voter education that is done, and to receiving support from individuals in the movement.
#
I’ve gotten my reps to sign on a co-sponsor to various bills. That’s easy, and it “makes a constituent happy” and gets them out of their hair. And then the bill languishes in Committee…. and quietly dies. Definitely makes a strong case for candidates from parties who can be as vocally vociferous as they will.
As for Dennis, even without the arm twisting aboard Air Force One, I suspect that if he were to have had to have cast the deciding vote–and he easily might have been compelled to do just that (man, it was close)–he would have voted for the Act. There are a lot of constituents in his district–as in mine–who are very much in favor of Single Payer, but whom this bill will definitely help in the short-term. Elected officials have to be realists–meaning continuing to fight to end the war, but acknowledging that short-term tactical victories are important as well. My rep–a Dem–voted against it, and as a result I’m working with an indie candidate to try to send him down in flames. If Dennis had voted no, we’d be not one inch closer to single-payer as a result, but a lot of people are ready to benefit from the Act would have paid the price for his “principled stand.” So he helped deliver some degree of relief–while making his own preferences clear. I have zero problem with that.
#
I am pleased to report that my campaign collected enough signatures for a single payer question – drafted by Mass Care – to be placed on the November ballot. The signatures were sent to Mass Care on July 16. Here is the campaign statement:
http://www.greenmassgroup.com/…