I am increasingly disheartened by the Boston Globe’s apparent dismissal of Jill Stein’s gubernatorial campaign, in the opinion pages and news coverage alike. The Op-Eds ignoring her are mounting. Whether Adrian Walker’s glaring omission was mindful or mindless, and whether Joan Vennochi’s dismissal was ignorant or spiteful, these biased actions deserve to be countered. I submitted a letter to the editor in response to Walker’s column, but the Letters editor called me to ask whether I was a paid staffer for Jill’s campaign. I told him that I’ve been working on a grassroots fundraising campaign that is poised to turn into a paid job, but that it’s message is an important one for Globe readers to learn about.

Cross-posted at DemocracyDays.com.

With the state legislature wrapping up its session last week, another two years have been squandered. Two years we couldn’t afford to waste, down the drain.

In those two years, we inched closer to runaway climate change. Environmental writer and activist Bill McKibben has added another “a” to Earth to show that we have already fundamentally altered the ecological balance of the home upon which we depend for all things.

In those two years, the economic system upon which we depend for most things unraveled to the point that our federal government has fundamentally transformed its role to a booster of private capital and private profits, while socializing the costs.

It wasn’t enough that we were spending $300 billion on a farm bill that benefits agribusiness while soaking us with chronic disease and the planet with devastating environmental costs. Or spending over half a trillion dollars a year on the military and its oil-addicted adventures. The last two years saw unprecedented transfers of wealth, in the trillions, directly from taxpayers to the same bankers and speculators responsible for the crises that have crushed us.

The Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Neil Barofsky, quietly released a report last month that shows that the “outstanding balance of overall Federal support for the nation’s financial system” jumped $700 billion over the past year to $3.7 trillion. The Globe didn’t cover that, but it did cover our governor’s cheery excursion to Iraq and Afghanistan. Meanwhile most of what we’ve heard from Beacon Hill was the political showdown over whether or not the genius move by the legislature to bring casinos to Massachusetts would also bring slot machines to the racetracks. Now that we have our answer, I think it’s safe to predict they will prove to be no answer at all.

In this context, it’s hard to argue that democracy is dawning in Massachusetts. The backroom dealing, legalized bribery, and general lack of responsiveness, transparency, and accountability that permeate state government are discouraging indicators. Even in revolutionary Massachusetts, democracy seems to be dying as the economy and the environment deteriorate.

But there is a candidate running for governor whose aim is to resuscitate and revitalize the dying-but-vital concept of government of the people, by the people, and for the people. While the Globe has largely marginalized her campaign — either because they don’t like her politics (my guess) or because her campaign warchest is a miniature one — Green-Rainbow Party candidate Jill Stein is offering Massachusetts voters badly-needed vision and timely, meaningful solutions. It’s no coincidence that Stein is the only candidate refusing to take campaign contributions from corporate lobbyists and the executives who hire them — making her campaign coffers small, but also making her immune to the influence-peddling of big money donors.

And while Stein is the most effective champion Massachusetts has for a strong Clean Elections law, there’s a tasty irony in 2010 that her grassroots supporters are trying to exploit. Stein is the only candidate to opt in to the limited public financing system that survived when the legislature killed the popular Clean Elections law, because the Beacon Hill Boys Club of Baker, Cahill, and Patrick don’t want to abide by spending limits.

If her supporters can raise $125,000 of qualifying contributions (anything under $250/person) by September 22, she’ll get $125,000 in matching funds. If they raise another $625,000 by mid-October, all of it will be matched. In other words, Stein could theoretically be running a $1.5 million campaign, and her opponents won’t know what hit them.

Pro-democracy advocates in Massachusetts (and beyond) are tired of the constant battle to hang on to what little remains of our supposedly democratic institutions, and fighting for tiny steps forward between giant leaps backwards. But there’s a new dawn and a new day for democracy.

August 10th is Democracy Day for Massachusetts, where hundreds of people will be giving $10 to the one clean-money campaign in the contest. This series of single-day fundraising events borrows from Ron Paul’s successful “money bombs.” Consider Democracy Days the people’s Clean Elections, where 75,000 $10 contributions by mid-October could propel Stein’s candidacy right into the heart of the election, and tip the balance towards democracy. She got over 76,000 votes in 2002 in a starkly different political atmosphere. Now that she’s being invited to the debates, this 4-way race in this independently-minded state full of frustrated voters means all bets are off.

Could this be democracy’s dawn?

And here’s my LTE responding to Walker’s column:

Guard dog barks off-key

To the editor:

As a proponent of small-d democracy, Globe columnist Adrian Walker would do well to recognize the fourth candidate vying for the corner office this November, Dr. Jill Stein.

In his latest column, “Attack dog barks off-key”, Walker correctly points out that “the major issues in this election, in no particular order, are jobs, health care, and education,” and that “we’ll be hearing a lot about the environment between now and November, too.”

He goes on to make a glaring omission. Declaring that one thing the election has going for it is “three candidates who can speak for themselves and campaign for themselves,” Walker leaves out the one candidate whose ideas on jobs, health care, education, and the environment are actually relevant to the crises we face in those sectors. Stein is advancing cross-cutting solutions to these and other interrelated crises, and she’s the only candidate who seems to think casinos exacerbate our problems as opposed to solving them. It’s no coincidence that she’s the only candidate refusing corporate money for her campaign, begging the question of whether Walker’s omission was mindful or mindless.

As a guard dog for our democracy, Walker is barking way off key.

Eli Beckerman

18 Bigelow Street

Cambridge, MA 02139