[Ed. note: for all the power and inspiration that came out of the NCMR, it did feel incredibly white and timid]
From Black Agenda Report
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by BAR editor and columnist Jared A. Ball
4/26/2011
The Media Reform Conference and Democracy Now! share common characteristics: they are the best that the white left has to offer, and profoundly inadequate. Democracy Now! doesn’t just shortchange people of color, but unions as well. And the politics of periodic Media Reform conferences are as blindingly white as the corporate variety.
Race, Class, Unions and Media “Reform”
There is truly good reason for friends to remind me of my having gone back on a previously made promise to stop attending the very white and liberal National Conference for Media Reform [6]. Again the conference gathered, this year in Boston a couple of weeks ago, and again nearly all of the Black and Brown people I spoke to expressed disappointment at being present but not so much heard. One friend promised to smack me and anyone else he hears about coming back in the future. Another more prominent Black woman within this and other related political struggles whose experience and work truly deserves more credit and attention than she gets simply raised her tired eyes above her glasses and asked me with all the frustration and fatigue in the world, “Jared, why do you come here?”
I told her it was because I get to see her and many others I truly admire and who I get to see too infrequently. I also told her that I come because there is legitimately a ton of great information and insight to glean from these events. Information, not so much analysis. But ultimately I told her I go because I hope it will lead to more of us doing what we need to do to collectively bring more focus to the struggles of Black, Brown and Indigenous communities in this country. So once again I am left with another critique of a so-called “movement” that I again will hope help inspire me and us to do more to do what we have to do to organize our media and political work to have greater impact.
So sure, I participated on a panel [7] about the troubled state of hip-hop politics and we all made points regarding this and the fact that finding air time for thoughtful rap music is as difficult as finding space for any thoughtful Black or Brown politics. I made sure to be clear that this was not for any lack of either but was the result of an overwhelming fear of such expression even among the white Left. Black and Brown radicalism is omitted culturally by the same mechanisms through which Black and Brown radicalism is omitted politically. Hip-hop is reduced sonically to the same narrow nonsense imposed upon its discussion politically by the academic and journalistic community. And, as we had to repeatedly point out, this was also the case in spaces occupied by white liberals who claim differences between themselves and the mainstream or right wing. And when I mentioned how the media darling of the left, Democracy Now!, was actually worse than [8] the mainstream Meet the Press in terms of Black participation several took note even if not all took it easy.
My point was and is simply that even the best, and it is the best, news media that the left has to offer is still a space inhospitable to left-of-center Black politics. And while this tendency seems solidly in place there is yet another way to see it. As BAR has long-ago reported [9], participation, particularly Black female participation, in this country’s labor unions is percentage-wise higher than any other segment of the population. So to now find that coverage of labor unions by the leading institution of the white left seems as bad as that of the mainstream shows yet another reason for members of the nation and world’s majority to be concerned.
John Nichols is a leading founder of and spokesperson for the media reform movement. During one of his talks [10] at this year’s conference he pointed out the absence of coverage of labor unions in the nation’s liberal mainstream press, noting that rarely do they mention unions at all and more infrequently than that do they mention unions by name. Nichols also pointed out the fact that it is too easy to pick on right wing media for this kind of criticism because, as he said, even without the radical right media world the liberal mainstream would be as bad as it is. But is this also true of the white left who claim difference from that liberal mainstream?
Well, looking at Democracy Now! [11], the flagship white left news media program, during the calendar year prior to this most recent up-tick in coverage due to the labor strife in Wisconsin we find that out of roughly 250 potential programs only 30 or 12% mention labor unions at all and only 9 or 3.6% mention them by name.** In yet another potential area for the Black and Brown left to impact the national discussion there is, again, a similar blind eye. It is also one more in a long line of examples pointing to the need of the world’s majority to work more closely to increase the impact of our journalism and media work. We and the world desperately need it.
For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Jared Ball. Online visit us at BlackAgendaReport.com [12].
Dr. Jared A. Ball [13] is author of I Mix What I Like: A Mixtape Manifesto (AK Press) and can be reached at IMixWhatILike.com [14].
** Democracy Now! online archives [15] were searched between January 1, 2010 and the end of January, 2011. The show airs each weekday, hence the “roughly 250 potential programs,” out of which those that mentioned “labor unions” or “unions” in this country at all were counted. Those that made even one reference and in passing were counted. This actually gives undue credit to the program considering that many of these references accompanied no real discussion and less actual information about or perspective of union members regarding the issues covered in that program. The following program dates had any mention of unions and those in bold specified them by name:
1/4/11, 12/20/10, 12/13/10, 1/6/11, 12/29/10, 12/23/10, 12/10/10, 12/2/10, 11/30/10, 11/2/10, 10/28/10, 10/14/10, 10/4/10, 10/1/10, 9/24/10, 9/14/10, 9/20/10, 8/25/10, 7/27/10, 6/22/10, 6/18/10, 5/31/10, 5/18/10, 4/16/10, 3/26/10, 3/25/10, 3/18/10, 2/16/10, 1/15/10, 1/13/10
http://traffic.libsyn.com/blac…
Source URL: http://blackagendareport.com/c…
Links:
1][2 http://blackagendareport.com/c…
3][4 http://blackagendareport.com/c…
5][6 http://conference.freepress.ne…
7][8 http://blackagendareport.com/c…
9][10 http://conference.freepress.ne…
11][12 http://www.BlackAgendaReport.com/
13][14 http://imixwhatilike.com/
15][16 http://www.addtoany.com/share_…
#
Why doesn’t the GRP itself publish more by people of color? The names atop GRP statements are invariably white. And so’s the language and style.
The GRP and GMG could eschew all the hokey, dated, white-folks folkie nonsense (e.g., the JS campaign song) and start reaching out to folks by using the type of “thoughtful rap music” the writers refers to. Let’s see some Immortal Technique, Mose Def, The Cube etc. on here.
If you want to stop being a party of old white folks, you have to stop talking–and writing,and singing–like them.