Just wanted to make sure people know about this upcoming conference which may be the start of something really exciting.  I know from my monitoring of Harvard, MIT, and other universities that ecosystem solutions to climate change are not only not on their radar but met with antagonism when brought up.  The conference organizers can use your help (and mine) in getting the word out.

Restoring Ecosystems to Reverse Global Warming

We have solutions!

More of our man-made carbon emissions to date have come from land mismanagement and the resulting loss of soil carbon than from burning fossil fuels. The good news is that we know how to remove that atmospheric carbon and store it back into the soils where it belongs, by harnessing the power of nature.

The Conference

Restoring Ecosystems to Reverse Global Warming is a 3-day conference with the goal to bring the power of biology front and center in the climate conversation. We are bringing together a stellar roster of speakers-scientists, land managers and activists-and participants from around the world to learn from one another and to devise strategies to expand vast natural soil carbon sinks around the world. To learn more about the speakers: http://bio4climate.org/confere…

Register here:

http://bit.ly/1qOBfAo

Help us support the conference!

http://www.razoo.com/story/Con…

Donations will keep tickets affordable, provide scholarships, pay for materials, assist with major outreach efforts before and after the conference, and help support our hard-working and dedicated staff. Any contribution is greatly appreciated!

Restoring Ecosystems to Reverse Global Warming is hosted by the Tufts Institute of the Environment and the Center for International Environment and Resource Policy at Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts.

Continue reading Restoring Ecosystems to Reverse Global Warming

The lead article on Bluemassgroup, the Democratic Party blog, is telling everyone to get behind Martha Coakley for Governor.  It is entitled “Coakley for Governor: The Small Differences That Matter.”

It starts with this telling comment:

“I understand the frustration with the candidates. The differences between Coakley and Baker don’t seem to be the yawning chasm that we’d like. But in the immortal words of Donald Rumsfeld, you go to war with the army you have.”

In other words:  “The Democratic Party candidate is only marginally better than the Republican.  She doesn’t really provide leadership on the things important to us.  But she’s the only choice for those of us with a two-party mentality.  So shut up and vote to endorse business-as-usual.”

Thank goodness the Green-Rainbow Party doesn’t engage in such shameful attempts to talk people into abandoning their values.

If you want to see three candidates who are really different from Charlie Baker, go to

http://www.green-rainbow.org/c…

Continue reading Voting for Republican Lite?

My Green-Rainbow Party voter registration is a stronger statement on the issues that I care about than are the votes that I cast for various candidates.  My Green-Rainbow Party affiliation is a public record and is in effect every day.

So what does that mean for the Democratic Party primary on Sep 9, 2014?  It means that I will not vote in it.

Not very many other voters will vote in the primary, either.  The Lenox Town Clerk predicts an extremely slow day (less than 20% turnout).  In my case, I do not participate in that primary because I am not a Democrat (and I would not be given a ballot to cast even if I showed up).  Not participating in other parties’ primaries is one of the statements that I made with my registration as a Green-Rainbow Party voter.

For the 2014 state elections it’s too bad that a Green-Rainbow Party gubernatorial candidate did not surface, although the party has nominated three fine candidates running statewide for the offices of Treasurer, Auditor and Secretary of the Commonwealth.

Our small party does sometimes have primaries of its own, which voters registered in other parties may not vote in.  When we have had primaries our voter turnout is much higher than it is for other parties.  

Continue reading Primary Statements

Softball advocacy for GMO labeling is the kind of boneheaded strategy that several of us were invited to play this morning.  

We must play hardball, instead.  We are up against food manufacturers who are oppose GMO labeling and who provide lavish funding to Democratic Party political leaders like House Speaker Robert DeLeo, who then block the legislation despite its popularity.  DeLeo and the lobbyist donors fully understand the game of political hardball.  DeLeo wants the industry lobby money and he knows securing the money is conditioned on doing just the sort of blocking he’s doing.  Votes that bestow power on his office, though, are taken for granted.

Against this backdrop is a ludicrous game of softball being espoused by MoveOn.

Continue reading GMO Labeling: House Speaker Doesn’t Play Softball and Nor Should We

It has been difficult for those of us fighting the proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline, educating the public and lobbying policy-makers to get a clear message from our elected representatives and candidates on where they stand on the issue.  Will they publicly fight it, will they support it, or will they straddle?  At the top political leadership we know clearly where the governor stands; he’s on the wrong side.  Governor Patrick adamantly and vocally supports this fossil fuel expansion that is a huge step in the wrong direction.

Local politicians like Ben Downing, Paul Mark, and Smitty Pignatelli make statements on the subject that are tempered and carefully parsed. They express no vision or resolve. They instill little confidence that they are willing to stick their political necks out in a very difficult fight.  They tell us they are ‘torn’ and that it’s a ‘difficult issue,’ that it’s the feds who are the authority, that the issue must be further ‘studied,’ and that they will follow the developments ‘with interest and concern.’  They may suggest that the pipeline should be situated on a different route, but they do not use their leadership position to broadly address the real issue of our continuing dependence on fossil fuels or to challenge the governor or the fossil fuel energy interests who pump money into the coffers of the Democratic and Republican parties.

Candidate Martha Coakley’s position statement is no better:

Martha is committed to building a clean energy future in Massachusetts and, while natural gas currently represents a critical piece of our energy mix, she continues to see it as a bridge to cleaner, renewable energy sources. She is also committed to doing everything possible to protect both homes and fragile environmental resources.

As you may be aware, the ultimate decision on this project rests with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and, like Governor Patrick, Martha believes FERC should ensure an open, substantive discussion with local residents before making a decision on the future of the project.

One gets the feeling that, once again, our political expectations are being managed down.

How refreshing, in this context, to hear clarity and firmness in a statement that was issued by an organized, growing, and feisty political opposition to establishment politics, the only political party in Massachusetts whose leaders and candidates neither solicit nor accept funding from private energy interests.  This opposition party is the Green-Rainbow Party.

Continue reading Let’s Get Real With Pipeline Opposition Statements