0

http://holyokesunonline.com/06…

Holyoke Resident Running for Lt. Governor, by Dennis P. Hohenberger (Holyoke Sun, 25 June 2010)

Richard P. “Rick” Purcell, a longtime Holyoke resident and community activist, is making a run for the state’s second highest office as the Green-Rainbow Party’s candidate for Lt. Governor.

During a lunchtime stroll in West Holyoke on Tuesday, Purcell spoke of his candidacy, the issues that matter most to him and the way the city has shaped him and his political views, which eventually led him to be Jill Stein’s running mate.

While Purcell and members of his party gather the necessary 10,000 signatures needed to be placed on the fall ballot, his campaign, though grassroots and relying on small, individual donations, continues to speak out on affordable healthcare, schools, the environment, gambling, and issues that matter to working class families.  

Continue reading Excellent interview with Rick Purcell, GRP 2010 candidate for Lt. Governor
Categories Tags , , , , , , ,

1

great op-ed by Max Page and Michael Ash, UMass Amherst:

AMHERST – “Shared sacrifice.” You will hear the governor say it every time he talks about the budget. It is the phrase used by Charles Murphy, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, when he unveiled a budget that cuts local aid – schools, police and fire, libraries, parks – by $234 million, and public higher education by $132 million.

It was echoed by Michael Widmer of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Association when he endorsed the House’s budget; “They (cities and towns) need to share in the pain given our fiscal realities.”

“Shared sacrifice” must poll well in focus groups. But it is a lie and a fraud.

Continued at

http://www.gazettenet.com/2010…

Continue reading The myth of shared sacrifice
Tags , , , , , ,

0

From The Boston Globe:

Patrick, displaying a front-runner’s confidence, responded with a call for eight debates, including two in western Massachusetts, though he did not specify they be televised. He also specifically urged that the debates include both Cahill and Baker, underscoring the benefit he believes will come through a three-way race in which Cahill draws from Baker’s potential conservative vote.

…

“The governor hopes that Tim Cahill and Charlie Baker will join him in one debate a week between Labor Day in September and Election Day in November, for a total of eight debates overall,” said a statement from spokesman Alex Goldstein.

…

Meanwhile, Stein complained in her statement that movie producers and biotech companies continue to receive breaks amid the national recession while state aid to cities and towns is cut.

She said voters “are looking for some way to end the giveaways” and redirect spending to town budgets.

“Charlie Baker and Deval Patrick are ducking debates already,” Stein said. “Governor Patrick has refused to appear on stage with other candidates on multiple occasions, allowing only forums without cross-candidate dialogue and real challenge. Often Charlie Baker is not showing up at all. Their fear of real debate is telling.”

It’s official, Deval Patrick and Charlie Baker are afraid of real debate, and afraid of the people’s candidate, Jill Stein!

Continue reading Baker & Patrick move for more exclusionary debates
Categories Tags , , ,

0

While the Herald chooses to ignore Jill Stein’s voice on the issues, the Stein campaign calls out the Governor for protecting Raytheon, Fidelity and biotech while slashing critical services left and right:

Stein Decries State Budget As A “Tragedy Of Misplaced Priorities”

by FRIENDS OF JILL STEIN on JULY 1, 2010

BOSTON –   Green-Rainbow gubernatorial candidate Jill Stein decried the Massachusetts state budget  signed by Governor Patrick yesterday as a  ”tragedy of misplaced priorities, declaring that “This budget signifies Beacon Hill’s accelerating abandonment of critical services that people need now more than ever.”

Stein challenged Governor Patrick’s assertions that the painful cuts were unavoidable.  “The Governor cannot duck his responsibility for the cuts or for the tax and fee hikes” according to Stein.  “These cuts are there because of deliberate decisions made by the Governor and the Democratic Party leadership.  They decided to protect powerful special interests and put the burden of balancing the budget on the backs of those least able to defend themselves. ”

“This budget hits struggling education programs with another $180 million in cuts, including cuts to public schools, and higher education – already cut more in Massachusetts than any other state over the past five years. Programs that provide for our elders, at risk youth, the disabled, the mentally ill, disadvantaged children and distressed families are all under attack. State and municipal workers providing essential services are being fired.”

Continue reading Massachusetts Budget — A Tragedy Of Misplaced Priorities
Tags , , ,

1

Is it possible to replace the “money bomb” with a “Democracy Day?” Can we stem the tide of unjust, profit-driven policy, controlled by big-money corporations and their lobbyists? What would it take in Massachusetts to build a viable political alternative that is NOT beholden to special interests, and is instead truly accountable to the people of the Commonwealth, driven by the needs and desires of ordinary citizens across the state?

As Carl Davidson said at a Majority Agenda Project event, we need to organize our money, our votes, and our ideas. I think one way to do all 3 together is through the Green-Rainbow Party of Massachusetts.

One mechanism I’ve been working on to help us organize our money is a remix of Ron Paul’s “money bomb.” Hating that term, we’ve been cooking up a more positive spin, called “Democracy Day”:

Continue reading Democracy Day #2 – 232 small-money contributions towards democracy!
Categories Tags , , ,

1

Originally posted at DemocracyDays.com, cross-posted at Blue Mass Group.

Nobody symbolizes the interests of organized money to corrupt the political process in Massachusetts, to generally subvert the will of the people, and in one notorious instance, to squash the Clean Elections Law, more clearly than disgraced former House Speaker Tom Finneran.

And nobody symbolizes the struggle for clean, corruption-free elections in Massachusetts more clearly than Jill Stein, the Green-Rainbow Party candidate for governor in 2002 and now in 2010.

Now, Finneran is daring you to tip the balance towards democracy.

Continue reading Stein campaign is a clarion call for clean elections
Categories Tags , , , ,

0

The MA legislature’s conference committee just made another $300 million in cuts to state health care, education grants, elder home-care services, child care for working parents, human services, and other areas of the state budget for FY2011, conveniently putting the blame on our newest senator, Scott Brown.

Not mentioned in the press releases is the fact  that our legislature  gave away $300 million they would otherwise have this FY2010 in “single sales factor (SSF)” tax expenditures to Fidelity/Raytheon/related manufacturing corporations for “job creation,”  even though many of those corporations  are actually cutting jobs. According to the Boston Globe, “Fidelity’s Massachusetts workforce now stands at  a more than 9,000 workers, down from 13,000 four years ago.”

As Jill Stein often puts it, these tax expenditures are literally  “payoffs for layoffs.”  In my opinion, they are also the legalized theft of public funds.

Why not use the tax dollars we’re throwing away on tax expenditures like these  to really create jobs by rehiring laid-off teachers, firefighters, librarians, and health care workers? Why not collect the taxes we would otherwise be due instead of raising the sales tax?

Want to know  how the “single sales formula” or “tax apportionment” scam works? Read on.  

Continue reading Payoffs for Layoffs Continue As Massachusetts Legislature Cries Crocodile Tears
Categories Tags , , , , , , , ,

0

The Age of Reptiles ended because it had gone on long enough and it was all a mistake in the first place. (Will Cuppy, How to Become Extinct, 1941)

What makes the town of Amherst what it is?  First, it is the presence of UMass and the two colleges. That is what makes the area the largest source of employment in western Massachusetts, bread and butter for many households, and that is what makes it a culturally stimulating life style desired by many-some fleeing urban anomie. Students clamoring for living space make it a landlord’s paradise.  Adding the bucolic remains of a previous agricultural setting has attracted gentrifying upper middle class families and retirees, turning it into a real-estate bonanza for banks, invested property owners and overrated Wall Street securities. Finally, the town’s well-regarded public schools attract many.  

Continue reading After Amherst
Tags ,

0

Between 1790 and the Civil War (the early republic) the people of New England (and much of the US) lived mostly scattered about on small farms. The miles between town centers would increase with Western expansion. But what has been called the “friction of distance” was, from the start, a much greater challenge to travel, location and commerce than it is now-in the era of carbon-fueled vehicles.   In fact, hundreds of thousands of people traveled primarily by foot (“shank’s pony”), not horse and wagon, increasing this friction even more. In the 1840s, tax records and household inventories make it clear that horse ownership was then less equally distributed than automobiles are among Americans today.  

Continue reading Build Up, Not Out
Tags ,

0

In our recent columns we questioned whether the historically inherited political structure of our existing towns with their existing borders remains relevant for addressing the looming energy and climate crises we face and suggested the benefits of a regional approach to economic production and services.  We also introduced the logic of relocalization, which would make towns more energy and food self-reliant and more carbon-conserving by shortening the distances of people to work and crops to market.  We now examine as case studies in relocalization two plans under review for Amherst: a corporate R&D project that has been proposed for land zoned “professional research park” or PRP in the very north of Amherst, and a redevelopment project that would bring a mix of housing and commercial/retail space to an area between the downtown and the UMass campus called the Gateway District.  

Continue reading Amherst Grapples with Relocalization
Tags ,