AT THE STATE HOUSE

Our Senators’ and Representatives’ voting records are public, but the web site of the Massachusetts legislature does not provide them easily and quickly (an understatement).  One source has told me that a way to obtain voting records that are not reported in the media is to travel to the State House and ask the Clerk of the respective chamber for a paper copy of the vote!

The State House web site is not very helpful.  Here is the answer to the Frequently Asked Question of how to find out how your legislature voted:

Roll Call votes are recorded in the journal … If the journal you need is not available [on the web site], then copies of the corrected proofs of the journals are available about two weeks after the day of the session and can be obtained from:

The Legislative Document Room

Room 428

State House

Boston, MA 02133

(617) 722-2860

The Document Room does not have a mail facility, so please send them a self-addressed stamped envelope with your request.

Also, the Clerks of each branch maintain a book of all the roll call votes recorded in a legislative session. That book is available for viewing within their offices. The Senate Clerk is located in Room 335 in the State House, the House Clerk in Room 145 of the State House.

When I am elected to represent the Fourth Berkshire District, I’ll make it a priority to have a voting record link on the front page of the web site that can be indexed by date, subject, bill number, and representative.  I will also publish my votes on my own site.  This information should be available within minutes of a vote being recorded.

Continue reading Voting Records – A Candidates Statement for Boston and for Lenox

The NYT “Room for Debate” column is hosting a discussion between five pundits under the rubric, “When is it Smart to Abandon your Party?”(The question actually refers to the wisdom of politicians themselves, and not voters, doing just that, with a focus on the Charlie Crist campaign in Florida). Sadly, all of the pundits themselves are in thrall to the system, and are more interested in how to strategize within it than in proposing solutions–in other words, trying to figure out what’s best for politicians–not voters.

I posted the following comment in the thread (still awaiting moderator approval as I write):

It’s interesting to see how many of these commentators note that the game is, in effect, rigged, to the benefit of the two majors. 1) Removing constraints to ballot access and 2) implementing clean elections funding laws would go a long way towards opening up opportunities for voter choice–but equally critical is 3) instituting instant run-off voting, which solves “the Nader problem” (voting for your preferred choice can lead to election of your least-favorite candidate) along with one of the most depressing aspects of current electoral politics–the woefully unexciting decision to vote for “the lesser of two evils.”

The need for such a system was well-evidenced here in Massachusetts during the recent special election. Many voters decided (unhappily, in my view) that the race for Ted Kennedy’s seat was a referendum on healthcare reform. For the relatively small percentage of true conservatives, that was no problem: their preferred choice was Scott Brown. But what of progressives who opposed a HCR bill that didn’t include a public option (along with a process that never even broached the subject of single-payer)? Alas, some voted for Brown, biting off their nose to spite their faces; many others simply stayed home. The ultimate effect: electing someone who is never going to be a friend to their own crusade.

Now we have a governor’s race–which is in fact a three-way race, as Dem State Treasurer Tim Cahill wages an independent battle, squaring off against presumptive GOP nominee Charlie Baker for conservative votes. At the same time, progressives’ dissatisfaction with Gov. Deval Patrick runs high. There’s an alternative there, too–the state Green party (Green-Rainbow Party) is running a first-rate candidate in Jill Stein (who garnered some 18% of the votes a few years back when she ran for Sec of the Commonwealth). The Party is sufficiently well-organized to overcome ballot access hurdles–but the money issue (GRP candidates don’t accept corporate contributions), lack of media attention (the media consortia who hold debates don’t want third party candidates), and, most of all, the fear of the spoiler effect aren’t easily resolved. The Libertarian Party faces the same dilemma. And it’s not just a dilemma for the parties, but for voters who are clearly VERY hungry indeed for more choice. But until the three reforms I noted above are put into play, too many voters will once again go to the polls holding their noses, while the corporate donors who fund BOTH major party candidates laugh all the way to the unregulated banks.

Continue reading The NYT on “Abandoning Your Party”

Yeh, this one’s for the workers who toil night and day

By hand and by brain to earn your pay

Who for centuries long past for no more than your bread

Have bled for your countries and counted your dead

Continue reading M a y D a y

Read on.

What strikes me as most important about this piece isn’t BP’s insanely long history of conscientious neglect. It’s the business about how BP isn’t particularly concerned with the ramifications of cap-and-trade. We can’t do much to save the shrimp–not that any of us have actually tasted wild domestic shrimp lately–but we can … maybe .. do something about cap-and-trade.

BTW, this is off Kos. Which I every now and then take an oath never to visit again. But if you can get past the snarky attitude of Markos and friends when it comes to third parties (and even noble Democratic outliers like Mike Gravel)… there’s much on the site that’s indispensable.

That there are people out there staying up all night doing this kind of research in order post an article gratis makes me more hopeful than does anything else. No, DGW isn’t going to approach Beck’s ratings anytime soon. But he’s reached me, and he’s reached you, and now you’re going to disseminate that link far and wide….  

Continue reading What’s a Little Oil in the Gulf of Mexico Got to do with Cap and Trade?