(Addtional information added on July 20, 2010 – please see the comments below.)

Speaking as a Green-Rainbow candidate for the Fourth Berkshire District State Representative seat, I am opposed to the Wind Energy Siting Reform Act as it was amended and passed by the Massachusetts Senate on February 4.  The bill opens the door to the Commonwealth overruling the decisions of local officials, even in communities that have a green vision for energy and have demonstrated progress and results.

While there is a need to reform the permitting process for wind and other alternative sources of energy, the first decisions on how a community will reduce its carbon footprint and promote energy alternatives must come from the local community itself.  There are many towns in the 4th Berkshire District working diligently and establishing solid programs with town departments, residents, and local businesses to support alternative energy and to reduce the community’s carbon footprint.

The Commonwealth should be charged with setting overall “green energy” goals and with providing a framework for communities to develop their own ways of meeting the goals.  Those communities that take the initiative to meet their goal should be given control over how this is done.  I will be eager to work with all communities in the 4th Berkshire District to support each community’s efforts to develop alternative energy and conservation programs that work for the community and that contribute to overall Commonwealth goals.

If a community fails to act pro-actively on its own initiative, the door should be open for the Commonwealth to expedite local permitting of projects that will promote alternative energy, and thus play a larger more active role in how green energy goals are met in that particular community.

However, as long as a community has documented a commitment to green energy and is demonstrating real progress and results towards the goals, the community should be allowed to follow current law in the issuance of permits to wind energy developers.

Continue reading Wind Energy Siting Reform Act

On February 26th, Suffolk University released their latest polling data [PDF] regarding the race for governor. This was the first poll to be conducted after Green-Rainbow candidate Jill Stein's announcement that she would be throwing her hat into the race for governor. Among the 500 voters they surveyed, 3% indicated that they would vote for Stein if the elections were held on the day they did their polling. The other candidates had higher figures, but no one breached the 50% mark.

Even more interesting, though, was the next question:

If it was apparent that your first choice could not win the election, which candidate (or party) would be your second choice? 

Continue reading Instant Runoff Voting still worth the effort