I can’t help but observe that the health care “reforms” that the Democratic Party is trying so hard to preserve in Ted Kennedy’s name would be summarily rejected by the voting public in countries that have single payer health care. If any European, Canadian, Australian, South African, South American, or Japanese leader tried to introduce in his/her country what Obama is peddling to us, he/she’d be out of office quickly.
Democrats in Massachusetts like to say that they have single payer health care on their platform, but that hasn’t advanced anything. In fact, we go backwards. Any real step towards single payer would require the immediate repeal of Chapter 58 and legislation known as Obama-care that is closely modeled after Chapter 58.
So why should we support the national “reform” that is modeled after Chapter 58?
I wish there were a Green-Rainbow candidate for whom to cast a vote in the special election. Without one, and without a candidate who is with me on health care, peace, re-localization, and controlling corporate influence in politics, I’m left with casting a vote for none of the above.
If the Obama’s health care reform was such a good thing for ordinary people, ordinary people in Massachusetts who support Chapter 58 should be easy to find. Funny how one doesn’t see these ordinary people promoting it.
I know some Republicans who are planning to vote for Scott Brown primarily to stop the national insurance company welfare plan (aka health reform). Many of these people have been or can be persuaded to support single payer health care after hearing a Green perspective. After all, in countries where single payer exists it is supported by conservatives and progressives, for very good reason (this reality is kept out of the domestive red vs blue debate here). The program that the Democratic Party is pushing is not a step towards single payer.
I admire Ted Kennedy for many things, but he made a wrong turn on the road to bringing world-class universal health care into this country.
Let’s stop being the example to the world of what NOT to do in public policy.
Continue reading Those “blue” reforms