Continue reading #restorethe4th Campaign Organizes Protests Against Unconstitutional SurveillanceThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. – Fourth Amendment, US Constitution
Regional Economic Models Inc. tomorrow releases the Massachusetts carbon tax impact study commisioned by the Massachussetts Carbon Tax Initiative, of The Committee for a Green Economy, a new political organization.
REMI forecasts $8 billion in benefits from the program over the next two decades.
It is time for a new public outcry — based on civil liberties and collective rights, beyond left and right, beyond ideology. It is time for all Obama supporters who once passionately stood up against the abuses of the Bush II administration to stand up once again. It is time for those who are afraid to speak out against an overzealous national security apparatus to begin to raise our voices together. In the face of the naked persecution of two prominent whistleblowers Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden, WikiLeaks activist Julian Assange, as well as dozens of other people trying to shine a light on the wrongdoing of unaccountable government forces, it is time to take the security establishment up on its suggestion to SAY SOMETHING upon seeing something.
I believe that President Obama crossed a line on his recent appearance on Charlie Rose, spewing outright lies in an effort to protect his administration from growing criticism:
Continue reading If you see something, #NSAsomethingThe Restructuring Roundtable is a mostly monthly (it takes the summer months off) meeting of the energy sector in Boston that takes a morning to discuss energy issues in depth with the major players from all around NE. There is also much time allotted for networking. The slides from the presentations are available online within a day or two and the video of the presentations comes a little later. It is a great resource for anyone interested in these issues and the public is most definitely invited.
The Roundtable, for me, follows in the tradition of the NE-wide energy policy meetings the great Duane Day used to host at the Department of Energy starting back in the days before Reagan killed us.
The 6/14/13 Restructuring Roundtable was “ISO-NE’s Generation Retirement Study & 2020 Resource Options for New England.” You can see the agenda and look at the slides here:
http://www.raabassociates.org/…
The video should be available in a few weeks. ISO-NE manages the electricity market in New England and is thus the entity that is responsible for maintaining the flow of electrons from one utility to another when necessary.
On behalf of all Americans who seek a new direction, who yearn for a new birth of freedom to build the just society, who see justice as the great work of human beings on Earth, who understand that community and human fulfillment are mutually reinforcing, who respect the urgent necessity to wage peace, to protect the environment, to end poverty and to preserve values of the spirit for future generations, who wish to build a deep democracy by working hard for a regenerative progressive politics, as if people mattered – to all these citizens and the Green vanguard, I welcome and am honored to accept the Green Party nomination for President of the United States.
–Ralph Nader’s acceptance statement, June, 2000
Despite “pwogressive” criticisms from William Kaufman and Mitchel Cohen in CounterPunch, I think the Green Shadow Cabinet launched earlier this year represents the single most-inspired initiative from Greens in the past decade. Running for office is a boilerplate third-party tactic — critical for building a credible and independent political party, but tired, temporary, constricting, and, too often, distracting. And while Ralph Nader made the case for the Green Party as a vehicle for an independent progressive force in American politics for a few years starting in the late nineties, he quickly changed his tune, muddling his message in the process. What vehicle were we left to organize around, for genuine grassroots democracy? His campaign? His non-profits that had been forced to distance themselves from Nader-the-politician? In his 2000 campaign, Nader made the point that politics — and power — isn’t about what happens on election day, but what happens in between elections, what happens in our communities day in and day out.
Continue reading Shadowboxing with powerThere can be no daily democracy without daily citizenship toward ‘a new birth of freedom.’ – Ralph Nader
by Howard Zinn
Published on June 2, 1976 in the Boston Globe (from the Zinn Reader)
Memorial Day will be celebrated … by the usual betrayal of the dead, by the hypocritical patriotism of the politicians and contractors preparing for more wars, more graves to receive more flowers on future Memorial Days. The memory of the dead deserves a different dedication. To peace, to defiance of governments.
In 1974, I was invited by Tom Winship, the editor of the Boston Globe, who had been bold enough in 1971 to print part of the top secret Pentagon Papers on the history of the Vietnam War, to write a bi-weekly column for the op-ed page of the newspaper. I did that for about a year and a half. The column below appeared June 2, 1976, in connection with that year’s Memorial Day. After it appeared, my column was canceled.
* * * * *
Memorial Day will be celebrated as usual, by high-speed collisions of automobiles and bodies strewn on highways and the sound of ambulance sirens throughout the land.
It will also be celebrated by the display of flags, the sound of bugles and drums, by parades and speeches and unthinking applause.
It will be celebrated by giant corporations, which make guns, bombs, fighter planes, aircraft carriers and an endless assortment of military junk and which await the $100 billion in contracts to be approved soon by Congress and the President.
Continue reading Whom Will We Honor Memorial Day?A quorum of Lenox Green Rainbow Party committee members joined individual Lenox Dept of Public employees and others in opposition to a Conservation Restriction on Yokun Ridge, which was voted on and narrowly passed the required 2/3 vote vote at Lenox Town Meeting on May 2, 2013.
By having adopted the ill-conceived Consrvation Restriction, a super-majority in Lenox today has removed the ability for a future generation’s super-majority to make its own decisions on what to do on its land. Not only is the vote an arrogant lack of trust it may also be harmful.
Because the land is owned by the Town of Lenox, a 2/3 super-majority would always have been needed for any project. This fact, along with existing environmental laws, was strong and sufficient protection.
The opportunity costs of this vote will be revealed in the future and the next generations will resent this year’s town meeting action. There will be missed opportunities resulting from future technologies and future needs that we have removed from future generations’ town meeting supermajorities.
The momentum for adopting of the conservation restriction was fueled by those who last year opposed the development of any wind energy proposal whatsoever. With classic fear-mongering, it offered as examples many projects around the country that were harmful or had been approved by small boards. None of the ‘bad’ projects the group offered as evidence, though, had required the approval of a supermajority of a town meeting. They were private projects, not public ones, and not subject to the rigors and public vetting of a town meeting. None of the ‘bad’ projects that were included in the propaganda would have been accepted by a town meeting supermajority.
A two-third majority today effectively took away the rights of the next generations’ two-thirds majorities. What a travesty this is for grass-roots democracy.
The conservation restriction was unnecessary.
What follows is the prepared text of the speech I gave at Lenox Town Meeting. (It must be noted that some Green-Rainbow Party members whose opinion and activism I respect voted in favor of the restriction.)
Continue reading An Unwise Conservation RestrictionAt Lenox Town Meeting on May 2, 2013 article 19 on the Town Meeting warrant invited public discussion on the legal costs of defending a Scenic Mountain Act appeal that a Lenox citizens group has filed. I am not a party to this particular appeal but I spoke in support of the right of citizens and businesses to appeal to a higher authority when they believe that basic practices of openness, transparency, and integrity have been violated. I voted NO on the article, which passed by a voice vote.
Here is the prepared text that I prepared for the town meeting. The actual speech delivered may be slightly different by a few words or clause changes made during verbal delivery but the message is the same.
Continue reading Citizens’ Appeal for Openness, Transparency, and IntegrityIf you were registered in Green-Rainbow Party in 2012 you received a postcard recently that said that ‘your voter registration has been updated’ because the Green-Rainbow Party is no longer a ‘political party.’ It sounds rather ominous, but it is meaningless from a practical point. What a waste of taxpayer money! One Green-Rainbow Party member called the postcard a ‘rude intrusion.’
I suggest ignoring the postcard. Despite the obtuse wording there is no change at all for how Green-Rainbow Party members will vote in elections. We just won’t have our own primaries, as we did in 2011 and 2012 until we grow more. We’re still here and you are still registered to vote in the Green-Rainbow Party!
So let’s grow rather than be intimidated.
The post card is misleading. It was mailed to you by the Massachusetts Elections Division, which is under the control of a partisan Democrat.
Continue reading Designating a PartyThe failures of the environmental community have been
(a) giving up on a “no regrets” strategy that concentrates on all the things the majority can agree on whether or not they believe in “global warming”
(b) concentrating on legislative and regulatory action to the exclusion of grassroots empowerment through practical demonstrations of individual and community solutions
(c) not building a united front of organizations all pushing in the same direction at the same time and actually executing a common strategy long-term through a battery of complementary tactics short-term (the environmental community is notorious for not knowing the difference between strategy and tactics)
(d) motivating almost exclusively by fear and thereby building learned helplessness and despair rather than fostering individual and community competence
(e) focusing almost totally on a problem orientation rather than a solutions orientation

